More From News
Democracy Has a Price Tag, and It’s Too High
October 26, 2026
October 26, 2026
By Dadi Darmadi

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — The room was in the basement of CGIS South, the kind of low-ceilinged, fluorescent-lit seminar room where Harvard teaches its future diplomats and generals. On Thursday afternoon, the speaker was neither American nor an academic.
Muhammad Jusuf Kalla, two-time Vice President of Indonesia and Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia (UIII), stood before a crowd of students from Harvard, MIT, and Boston University with a simple spreadsheet logic that cut through two hours of theory about global uncertainty.
His topic was “Leadership Amidst Uncertainty: Lessons from Experience.” His warning was blunt: Indonesian democracy is becoming too expensive to stay honest.
“If the cost of becoming a regional head is very high, while the official earnings are significantly lower, we must question how the political system is financed,” Kalla said. “The issue of political expenses needs to be addressed to prevent it from becoming an avenue for corruption.”
It was not a line from a transparency NGO report. It was from a man who has financed, and won, more elections than almost anyone in Southeast Asia.
Four Uncertainties
Kalla, known at home as Pak JK, told the Harvard audience that Indonesia’s socio-economic future rests on four uncertainties. Three were familiar to any student of international relations: global wars and supply-chain shocks, climate change and natural disasters, and the quality of public policy in deciding a national budget.
The fourth was the one that made the room look up from their laptops.
The cost of politics itself.
To run for district head — a bupati or wali kota — in Indonesia, a candidate must pay for a party nomination, mount a months-long campaign across islands, pay for witnesses at tens of thousands of polling stations, and fund a ground operation that would rival a small corporation’s. The bill, Kalla said, can run into millions of dollars. The official salary of the winner, over five years, does not come close.
The math, he suggested, does not add up. And when the math does not add up, the system finds other ways to pay.
“What happens after?” a Harvard Kennedy School student asked during Q&A. Kalla’s answer was matter-of-fact: the pressure to recover the investment begins on day one in office.
For American students used to discussing campaign finance in terms of Super PACs and lobbying disclosures, the Indonesian version felt more immediate, more physical. It was not about influence. It was about survival.
A Chairman’s Lesson
It is a striking subject for the Chairman of UIII’s Board of Trustees to raise abroad.
UIII, the international Islamic university founded in Depok under Kalla’s chairmanship, was created to project Indonesian Islam as modern, moderate, and democratic. But Kalla’s lecture at Harvard was a reminder that democracy is not just an ideal to be exported — it is a system with maintenance costs.
For nearly two decades, Kalla has been the rare Indonesian politician willing to say publicly what many say privately: that decentralization, which brought democracy closer to the people after the fall of Suharto in 1998, also brought with it a marketplace.
His presence at Harvard was part of a broader American tour that began at Northern Illinois University, where he delivered a two-week Vice President Kalla Lecture Series on autonomy, conflict resolution, and green transition, and ended the next day at Yale with a lecture on humanitarianism and disaster.
But it was here, in Cambridge, where his message was most directly aimed at future leaders.
Leadership in uncertainty, Kalla argued, is not about having the right answers for war or climate change. It is about whether the system that produces leaders allows them to be honest in the first place.
The students left with a paradox that does not appear in textbooks. The world’s third-largest democracy, often praised as a success story, is warning that its own success has made politics too expensive — and that unless that cost is fixed, every other policy, from disaster response to green energy, will be built on a fragile foundation. []